Student belonging continues to be an important professional development topic for instructors because of its connection to increased retention. At the same time, because Open Educational Resources (OER) can be edited, they have been touted as a potential solution for furthering Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in the classroom. But which edits to OER would be most impactful for actually furthering students’ sense of belonging? And what role do library publishers play in encouraging faculty authors to implement these best practices? This session will present results from a qualitative research study that asked fourteen UC Santa Cruz undergraduate students to reflect on existing OER in order to better understand what impedes their sense of belonging. The study’s more exploratory and open-ended approach, which invited students to reflect on OER as they currently are with minimal prompting, was intended to identify barriers that may not have previously surfaced when assessing modified OER. The webinar will highlight key questions faculty authors should ask themselves about course reading language, organization, and purpose in order to edit OER with student belonging in mind. The presentation will conclude with a reflection about library publishers might operationalize best practices such as the ones found in our study. In University Presses, developmental editors often take on this role, prompting authors to follow style guides, refine the organization of their arguments, and advocate for potential readers’ needs. But in library publishing, where roles are less well-defined and faculty may be more reticent to follow such guidelines, how might we ensure that the OER that are created as part of our programs are most effective for learners? Whose responsibility is this and how do we keep learners at the forefront of our publishing process?
NOTE: Video stream link goes to a YouTube playlist containing all watch party 1 presentations.
Video Stream